SHP has always regarded the development of textbooks as an effective if discreet way of providing CPD for teachers. Good textbooks communicate new ideas about teaching and learning and about the content of History itself even if this CPD is disguised in the form of material written for use by KS3, GCSE or A level students. Our new A level series, ‘Enquiring History‘ (which appears from March 2012 onwards) is very much in this tradition, aiming to help develop the quality of teaching and learning at A level.

Our main concerns in planning the series and writing and editing the books have been to

  • create books that students are interested in reading, not simply ‘using’. This is probably the hardest task of all. One way we’ve gone about this is by focussing on individuals as people with personalities and depth of character who often face complex decisions. If people in the past are just names on the page then it’s no wonder students find learning difficult and reading a chore.
  • communicate up-to-date scholarship and help students understand that our historical knowledge and understanding is constantly developing as a result of research and the continuing ‘conversation amongst historians’. Each author has been working with a research historian to ensure that the books are as up-to-date as possible.
  • focus on helping students overcome the problems that recur every year. One key element in planning has been to identify a list of ‘this is what they struggle with’ items. Then, in the books, we’ve tried to tackle these head on and make them explicit, whether it’s a big conceptual issue or something that appears minor but saps confidence such as knowing that Richard of York and Richard of Gloucester were different people.
  • help students develop their ability to study independently, in groups or on their own. Each chapter takes the form of an enquiry with a single structured activity, guiding students through the material and encouraging them to use other books. These books are definitely NOT ‘the only book you’ll need’. We want students to use them as springboards for further reading.

The results we hope are books that are inspired by the drive to help students learn effectively while presenting the best possible picture of current scholarship. We want students to be able to use the books confidently on their own but you will also be able to use these books in class – they’re supported by a range of teaching activities and support material on the series website which will be free to teachers.

What you will not find (and it may be the first thing you notice) is that these books make no references to awarding bodies or their specifications or examinations. They’re in part a return to the olden days when books were about history, not about specifications, although those olden days books didn’t pay any attention to the problems and needs of students as I hope we’re doing. Of course we’ve been aware of the nature of specifications in planning but that’s a far cry from writing for the limitations of a single specification, especially given the difficulty that specifications and examiners have in keeping up with recent historical research.

Of course the aims above are our ideals. Any decent series of materials starts with high ideals and then tries to compromise as little as possible when faced with deadlines and all the practicalities of real life that confront authors. No author has the luxury of spending their time on one book. They’re all full-time teachers or educational free-lancers juggling a variety of projects. Therefore writing is often tucked away at weekends or in holidays – what’s remarkable is that those people who have written for SHP over the years have come so close to editorial ideals and hopefully will again on this series. As series editors, Michael Riley, Jamie Byrom and I are constantly grateful for all the hard work our authors put in and their patience when asked to rework a page, a section or even rethink a chapter.

So, what’s on offer? In spring and summer 2012 we’ll publish 4 books, partly chosen with an eye to supporting teachers of some ‘minority’ topics who are often excluded as publishers go first and foremost for ‘the big sellers’. Our first 4 topics are The Crusades, The Wars of the Roses, The French Revolution, The Russian Revolution (I know the last one’s popular but we have to accommodate Hodder’s wish to make a profit somewhere). Each book is 144pp and in colour (which makes, for example, family-trees so much more comprehensible by using different colours and writing explanatory text – ‘follow the blue line down until …’). Another ten topics are in development for publication in 2013 and 2014.

For more details keep an eye on this website as we’ll provide details of each book ahead of publication (and with a bit of luck video clips from the authors) and also on the Hodder History Website.

This has been an ‘information’ blog. Next time I’ll do something useful, exemplifying the series by focussing on one of the major problems faced by all students embarking on a new A level topic – how to gain an overview of the whole topic, both to boost their confidence and enable them to tackle individual questions more effectively.

(28 Nov 2011 Update: This particular blog has been inundated with spam and is now closed for comment – instead, please email your comments using the addresses found on the website).

How did you become fascinated by history?

For me, it was Mr Mumford’s history walks. Mr Mumford, my history teacher at secondary school, liked doing history in muddy boots. In his history lessons we explored the history around us in the Central Pennines: ruined mills, handloom weavers’ cottages, pre-industrial causeways, the canal, the Roman road. Later on, he took us further afield to Speke Hall near Liverpool, to Ironbridge, to Hadrian’s Wall. Mr Mumford’s trips are my most abiding memory of secondary school. Sadly, I have no memory of fieldwork in the sixth form or at university. This is simply because there wasn’t any. In six years of study, not one of my teachers or lecturers ever provided an opportunity to learn any history beyond the classroom, lecture theatre or library. I didn’t think anything of it at the time, but, looking back, it now seems very sad. History had become a different subject, ruled by the written word (even the pictures disappeared!), and much diminished.

Connecting young people with the history around them should be a core aim of every history department in the country. We are blessed to live in a land with some of the most extensive, eclectic and remarkable historic structures in the world. Our historic environment is the most wonderful leaning resource that we history teachers could ever wish for. ‘History Around Us’ was an essential part of the Schools History Project when it began 1972. By engaging young people with their historic environment the Project aimed to provide students with the basis for a continued interest in history, to develop their enquiry skills and to connect them in a direct and authentic way to people in the past. ‘History Around Us’ is still one of SHP’s six guiding principles . The Project deeply regrets the fact a study of the historic environment is no longer a requirement of all the SHP GCSE specifications. SHP believes that there should be more opportunities for young people to study the history around them and it continues to develop innovative approaches to the study of the historic environment.

For some lucky students ‘History Around Us’ might mean a study tour to St Petersburg or to Paris, but it’s hard to make such fieldwork an entitlement. And, in any case, this is more ‘History around Them’. SHP has always been keen to develop strategies for engaging students with buildings and sites in their own locality. A fifties council estate, a medieval parish church, a Victorian sewage works, a deserted village, and hundreds of other sites, can all provide potential for a worthwhile study. Each year at SHP’s annual conference, some creative practitioners share their strategies for engaging students with a site in their local area. You’ll find some lovely examples of their work in the ‘Teaching Ideas and Activities’ section of our website. Mary Mills and Catherine McHarg of English Heritage (and regular workshop leaders at the SHP conference) have produced plethora of good stuff on using the historic environment for the Heritage Learning website www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/default.aspx   You’ll also find some important principles and strategies in the recent resource that Ian Dawson and Chris Culpin have produced for our own website [ click here ].

In my own school this year, we’re planning to make more of the history around us in Somerset. Next term our Year 8 students will be producing an interpretations panel for the civil war battle that took place just beyond the rugby pitches. In the summer term, they’re going to be researching what the Victorian buildings in their own villages and towns can tell us about Victorian minds. For our Year 7 students we’re planning to team up with English and Art during activities week to do some creative and critical work at a nearby Elizabethan house.

If you have an example of worthwhile ‘History Around Us’ from your own school then please tell us about it in a comments below.

This afternoon, I took my A level history group to an archaeological dig at a local Iron Age hill fort. The students will be focussing on aspects of Roman Britain for their A2 independent enquiries so a chance to experience historical investigation at first-hand seemed too good to miss. Ham Hill is the largest Iron Age hill fort in Britain, but we know relatively little about it. Why was it built? How was it used?  What happened to it after the Roman occupation? Archaeologists from Cambridge and Cardiff universities will be trying to answer these questions over the next three years (www.hamhillfort.info) .

As we toured the site, my students became increasingly curious about the lives and beliefs of the Iron Age inhabitants of Ham Hill. They were intrigued by a crouch burial found in a ditch, surprised by the decorative beauty of Iron Age pottery and puzzled by the skeleton of a dog found in the bottom of a grain pit. Over the next few weeks, I’ll need to build on this initial curiosity by developing the students’ knowledge of Roman Britain and by getting them fired up about the nature and extent of ‘Romanisation’. Hopefully, they’ll soon start arguing. Then I’ll know they’re ready to begin their independent enquiries.

As I drove home, I reflected on how so much of what we’d done at Ham Hill was based on SHP principles that were established forty years ago. Helping students to engage with the history around them, to become curious, to undertake genuine historical enquiry, to respect evidence, to understand the mindset and motivation of people in the past, to explain change, and (most important of all) to enjoy the study of history – these principles are still central to the philosophy of the Schools History Project as we approach a significant birthday (see SHP principles). In 2012, SHP will be forty years old! It’s easy to forget just how radical and distinctive the Project’s vision of school history was in 1972. By establishing a pedagogy based on the structure of the discipline, the Project provided a framework which, in my view, has served school history incredibly well over the last forty years. As specialist history teachers, we have a shared understanding of our subject that often makes history a beacon in the school curriculum. You only need to attend the SHP conference, or to read Teaching History, to be inspired by the creativity and rigorous thinking that underpins the learning in so many history classrooms. This practice is rooted in a shared understanding of the discipline that has its origins in the Schools Council History Project and the bold thinking of 1972.

Forty is a special birthday and we’re hoping for some decent presents. Here’s four suggestions for Messrs Gove and Gibb:

  • A revised national curriculum that preserves all that’s best about the current Key Stage 3 programme of study.
  • A requirement that the revised national curriculum is taught in all schools.
  • A reform of GCSE that will ensure genuine progression from Key Stage 3.
  • Adequate funding for specialist professional development for all history teachers

Have I asked for the right presents? Maybe I should be cheeky and ask for five; is there anything I’ve forgotten?

Next Time: In my next blog, I’ll dig deeper into history fieldwork. Why is it so important and why isn’t there more of it?

See Also: The new item from Ian Dawson and Chris Culpin on History Fieldwork

 

Goodrich Castle, taken by Ian

Goodrich Castle

A new item for the ‘Teaching Ideas and Activities’ section of the site, by Ian Dawson and Chris Culpin:

Reviewing the use of fieldwork in History courses

This guidance is structured around a series of questions which aim to assist teachers who are:
a) planning a sequence of lessons around a site visit at KS3, GCSE or A level
b) revising or re-thinking an existing course, with a view to including some fieldwork or improving the fieldwork/visit currently on offer

A case study on Goodrich Castle is also included, together with an article by Chris Culpin, reproduced by permission of the HA.

… news on SHP’s A Level publications. A new series for June 2012.

For years people have wanted another SHP Conference – in the south. Well, on 26th November we get as close as we can with a day conference at the British Library in London.

There’s plenary sessions from Michael Wood and Christine Counsell and two workshop sessions, each with six tantalising options to choose from.

Of course, as this isn’t a residential conference it will lack the tradtional Saturday evening nonsense but otherwise we aim to recapture the camaraderie, inspiration and simple enjoyment of discovering how many other people share our passion for history teaching.

Find out more on the SHP website.

Ian Dawson

The upgrade is well underway. The basic structure of the site remains unchanged – so it’s ‘only’ about re-design, compactness and efficiency. Oh yes – and adding the News Hub, and the blog, and the Twitter feed and the Facebook link and …

It’s great working with Esther (Web Fellow) – loads of enthusiasm and a fund of ideas. But I do feel I’m 12 again and waiting to get my homework marked!

And, later this week, we’ll be asking Michael for his verdict. Oooh eck – I’m due to see the Head!

Pat

SHP has an energetic, vibrant, thoughtful community. And we’re now reflecting this energy in a new blog

© 2011 Schools History Project Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha